Here you will find the right answers
The moneyland.ch forum lets you exchange knowledge on numerous topics related to money and get answers to your questions at any time. Join forum users and experts in discussions relating to banking, investment, insurance, retirement, telecom and everyday money topics.
Show categories
I had a collision with a cyclist was completely spaced out and slammed into the side of my car. My car was badly damaged and the guy was injured and his bike was totaled. The cyclist was completely at fault, but I was just informed that I have to cover part of the damages. Why would I have to cover damages when I am not at fault?
Hi there,
When an accident involves both a motorcar driver and a pedestrian or a driver of a non-motorized vehicle, the motorcar driver may be held liable for part of the costs even when they are not at fault.
The reason for this is that they hold greater accountability due to the danger which motorcars pose to other road users.
Best regards from Moneyguru
More on this topic:
Car insurance comparison
Personal liability insurance comparison
