Most investors are aware that fees charged by investment service providers detract from their returns. That applies to investing with an asset management service just as surely as it applies to investing yourself using a stockbroker. The way that fees are structured varies between service providers. The most important cost factors that may apply are:
- Asset management fees
- Brokerage fees
- Fees charged by investment funds and structured product providers
- Stamp taxes
- Sales commissions
- Performance-based fees
In this guide, moneyland.ch explains what these fees are, and when they apply.
This is the fee you pay to the service provider for the management of your investment portfolio. In addition to the cost of asset management, this fee also normally covers any custody fees. With many asset management service providers, the asset management fee also covers brokerage fees. Important: Asset management fees are often described as flat fees, which can lead on to believe that they cover all of the investment costs. But in practice, there are additional costs that are not covered by the asset management fee.
The asset management fee is typically a flat fee that is charged as a percentage of your portfolio’s value. Often, each portfolio offered by the same service provider will have its own flat fee. In many cases, the larger a portfolio’s stock component is, the higher the flat fee will be.
When the asset manager buys and sells investments like stocks, bonds, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the trades generate brokerage fees. Some asset management service providers charge brokerage fees separately. With others, the trading costs are covered by the flat asset management fee.
Robo advisors vs. conventional asset management
If you are content to use online-only services, then using a robo advisor instead of asset management from a conventional bank can be worth considering. These companies only offer their services via web portals or mobile apps. Often, their fees are lower than those charged by conventional banks. Another possible advantage of robo advisors is that they often have very low capital requirements for opening a portfolio. Many conventional banks have high minimum entry requirements of 50,000 francs or more.
The interactive asset management comparison on moneyland.ch accounts for both conventional asset management services and those that only provide services online. You can use the filters to limit results to conventional service providers if you want to.
- Fees charged by funds and structured product providers
These fees are not directly related to which asset management service you use. Whether or not you have to pay these fees, and how much you will pay, depends on which investment vehicles are used in your portfolio. These costs do not apply to holding individual bonds, shares in individual stocks, or other direct investments. They only apply when your asset manager uses investment funds like ETFs, and structured products like tracker certificates. These ongoing, annual fees are shown as the total expense ratio (TER). They are deducted directly from the fund’s assets.
The TERs of ETFs and index funds are usually below 0.5 percent per annum. Some have TERs of less than 0.1 percent. Actively-managed funds, on the other hand, typically have much higher fees. TERs in excess of 1 percent per annum are not uncommon.
Many kinds of securities – including stocks, bonds, and ETFs – are subjected to Swiss stamp duties when they are bought and sold. These taxes are always identical regardless of which Swiss service provider you use. You pay 0.075 percent tax on trades of Swiss securities, and 0.15 percent tax on foreign securities. Swiss index funds, on the other hand, are not subject to stamp duties.
Asset management service providers may receive retrocession fees from third parties – such as managers of investment funds used in portfolios. From a customer perspective, these sales commissions are not a direct cost. But they do have an impact on total costs because funds and other products that pay out sales commissions are often more expensive than equivalent products without sales commissions.
Sales commissions can create a conflict of interests because the asset management service provider may choose to use funds that pay them sales commissions even when these are not the optimal investment solution. Although any sales commissions paid should be made available to you as the end customer, there are service providers that keep them rather than passing them on to investors.
Many service providers forgo using products with sales commissions altogether. You can find these using the filters in the interactive asset management comparison on moneyland.ch.
Some asset management service providers have performance fees that are based on a percentage of investment returns over a certain period of time. Typically, the fees are based on the previous year’s performance. The exact terms and conditions vary between service providers. In many cases, you only pay performance fees if your investment return surpasses a predetermined performance threshold. Other service providers base the fee on the total investment return. Performance fees are only used by relatively few asset management service providers.
- Other asset management costs
Depending on which bank you use, there may be additional costs, such as markups on currency exchange rates, and fees charged by stock exchanges. Some service providers charge custody fees separately, rather than including them in the asset management fee.
How can I reduce the cost of asset management?
A simple way to minimize your costs is to compare asset management offers. Asset management fees vary hugely between service providers. Paying more for the same service results in lower returns, and less money for you.
When comparing the costs of asset management services, you should also account for the fees of the available investment funds and structured products. The TERs of funds and structured products can make up a large part of your total costs. Portfolios based on actively managed mutual funds typically generate much higher investment costs than portfolios that use index funds and passively managed ETFs. There is no guarantee that actively managed investment vehicles will outperform passively managed solutions.
When choosing between different portfolios, it is important not to look at the costs only. Although portfolios with large stock components typically have higher fees, they have usually delivered higher returns. So while stock investments may generate more costs, they also have the potential to bring bigger gains.
More on this topic:
Compare Swiss asset management offers now
Asset management: The pros and cons
Robo advisors: Online asset management services explained